USA/China — Gates Urges Positive U.S.-China Military Relations

SINGAPORE — Eco­nom­ic and polit­i­cal coop­er­a­tion between the Unit­ed States and Chi­na has flour­ished despite dif­fer­ences over U.S. arms sales to Tai­wan, and the same should be true of the mil­i­tary rela­tion­ship between the two coun­tries, Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates said here today.

9th International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Shangri-La Dialogue, in Singapore, June 5, 2010
U.S. Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates speaks at the 9th Inter­na­tion­al Insti­tute for Strate­gic Stud­ies, The Shangri-La Dia­logue, in Sin­ga­pore, June 5, 2010.
DoD pho­to by U.S. Air Force Mas­ter Sgt. Jer­ry Mor­ri­son
Click to enlarge

In a speech open­ing the first ple­nary ses­sion of the ninth annu­al “Shangri-La Dia­logue,” an Asia secu­ri­ty sum­mit orga­nized by the Inter­na­tion­al Insti­tute for Strate­gic Stud­ies, Gates not­ed that although the arms sales have been going on for decades, Chi­na has cit­ed them as its rea­son for break­ing off inter­ac­tions between the U.S. and Chi­nese mil­i­taries. “For a vari­ety of rea­sons,” Gates said, “this makes lit­tle sense.” He point­ed out that U.S. arms sales to Tai­wan have been going on through­out the decades since the 1979 nor­mal­iza­tion of rela­tions between the Unit­ed States and Chi­na. In addi­tion, he said, the Unit­ed States has demon­strat­ed for years that it does not sup­port inde­pen­dence for Tai­wan. “Noth­ing – I repeat, noth­ing – has changed in that stance,” he said. 

And because China’s accel­er­at­ing mil­i­tary buildup focus­es large­ly on Tai­wan, Gates added, U.S. arms sales are impor­tant to main­tain­ing peace and sta­bil­i­ty across the Strait of Tai­wan and through­out the region. 

Con­sid­er­ing all this, he said, Pres­i­dent Barack Obama’s deci­sion in Jan­u­ary to sell select­ed defen­sive weapons to Tai­wan should have come as no surprise. 

“It was based on well-estab­lished prece­dent and the long­stand­ing belief of the U.S. gov­ern­ment that a peace­ful and non-coerced res­o­lu­tion to the Tai­wan issue is an abid­ing nation­al inter­est, and vital for the over­all secu­ri­ty of Asia,” the sec­re­tary said. 

Though the Unit­ed States and Chi­na dis­agree on this mat­ter, Gates told the del­e­gates, U.S. arms sales to Tai­wan over the decades since nor­mal­iza­tion have not imped­ed clos­er polit­i­cal and eco­nom­ic ties or clos­er ties in oth­er secu­ri­ty are­nas of mutu­al interest. 

“Only in the mil­i­tary-to-mil­i­tary are­na has progress on crit­i­cal mutu­al secu­ri­ty issues been held hostage over some­thing that is, quite frankly, old news,” he said. “It should be clear to every­one now – more than 30 years after nor­mal­iza­tion – that inter­rup­tions in our mil­i­tary rela­tion­ship with Chi­na will not change Unit­ed States pol­i­cy toward Tai­wan.” Oba­ma and Chi­nese Pres­i­dent Hu Jin­tao have advo­cat­ed a pos­i­tive mil­i­tary-to-mil­i­tary rela­tion­ship between their coun­tries, Gates not­ed. “The Unit­ed States Depart­ment of Defense wants what both Pres­i­dents Oba­ma and Hu want: sus­tained and reli­able mil­i­tary-to-mil­i­tary con­tacts at all lev­els that reduce mis­com­mu­ni­ca­tion, mis­un­der­stand­ing and mis­cal­cu­la­tion,” he said. 

The absence of mil­i­tary-to-mil­i­tary rela­tion­ships between the Unit­ed States and Chi­na has a cost, Gates added. “I believe they are essen­tial to region­al secu­ri­ty and essen­tial to devel­op­ing a broad, resilient U.S.-China rela­tion­ship that is pos­i­tive in tone, coop­er­a­tive in nature and com­pre­hen­sive in scope,” he said. “The Unit­ed States, for its part, is ready to work toward these goals.” 

Gates had hoped to vis­it Bei­jing while he was in the region to attend the Shangri-La Dia­logue, but Chi­nese offi­cials con­veyed the mes­sage recent­ly that the tim­ing was­n’t right. While en route to Sin­ga­pore ear­li­er this week, the sec­re­tary expressed his cha­grin to reporters. 

“I’m dis­ap­point­ed that the [People’s Lib­er­a­tion Army] lead­er­ship has not seen the same poten­tial ben­e­fits from this kind of a mil­i­tary-to-mil­i­tary rela­tion­ship as their own lead­er­ship and the Unit­ed States seem to think would be of ben­e­fit,” he said. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →