USA — Programs Will Suffer Without Adequate Funding, Mullen Says

WASHINGTON, Feb. 16, 2011 — Mil­i­tary pro­grams will suf­fer if the Defense Department’s bud­get for fis­cal 2011 isn’t passed imme­di­ate­ly, the nation’s top mil­i­tary offi­cer told the House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee here today.
Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, echoed the warn­ing issued by Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates that the Defense Depart­ment faces a cri­sis if it’s forced to con­tin­ue oper­at­ing under a con­tin­u­ing res­o­lu­tion with less mon­ey than it needs.

“Some pro­grams may take years to recov­er if the con­tin­u­ing res­o­lu­tion is extend­ed through the end of Sep­tem­ber,” the chair­man said in pre­pared remarks. 

“I urge you to pass the fis­cal year 2011 defense bill imme­di­ate­ly,” Mullen said. “Even at a reduced topline, it will pro­vide us the tools we need to accom­plish the bulk of the mis­sions we have been assigned.” 

Forg­ing on with mon­ey from the con­tin­u­ing res­o­lu­tion, he said, “would not only reduce our account by $23 bil­lion, it would deprive us of the flex­i­bil­i­ty we need to sup­port our troops and their families.” 

Mullen not­ed that the ser­vices have tak­en “dis­rup­tive, and in some cas­es, irre­versible steps” to live with­in the con­fines of the con­tin­u­ing res­o­lu­tion, which “ulti­mate­ly make us less effec­tive at what we’re sup­posed to do for the nation.” 

As a result of the short­fall, Mullen told the pan­el, the Navy did not buy a sec­ond Vir­ginia-class sub­ma­rine or the gov­ern­ment-fur­nished equip­ment for anoth­er Arleigh Burke-class destroy­er as planned. Fur­ther, he said, the Army and Marine Corps have cur­tailed or frozen civil­ian hiring. 

“All the ser­vices are now pre­vent­ed from issu­ing con­tracts for new major mil­i­tary con­struc­tion projects,” Mullen told the com­mit­tee members. 

Speak­ing in sup­port of Pres­i­dent Barack Obama’s fis­cal 2012 defense bud­get request, the chair­man not­ed that Gates had told the com­mit­tee what it will do and had led the effort to make those things possible. 

“As the sec­re­tary laid out, this bud­get, com­bined with the effi­cien­cies effort he led, pro­vides for the well-being of our troops and fam­i­lies, … ful­ly funds cur­rent oper­a­tions in Afghanistan and Iraq, … and helps bal­ance glob­al risk through stream­lined orga­ni­za­tion, smarter acqui­si­tion and pru­dent mod­ern­iza­tion,” Mullen said. 

The chair­man said he and the ser­vice chiefs sent a rare “24-star let­ter” to the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee this week, express­ing their unqual­i­fied sup­port for the mil­i­tary health care pro­gram changes includ­ed in the president’s fis­cal 2012 defense bud­get request. 

“Please know that we will con­tin­ue to invest wise­ly in crit­i­cal care areas,” Mullen said, “to include research, diag­no­sis and treat­ment of men­tal health issues and trau­mat­ic brain injury, … enhanced access to health ser­vices … and new bat­tle­field technologies.” 

The defense bud­get also is crit­i­cal, Mullen said, because glob­al com­mit­ments have not shrunk. 

“If any­thing, they have grown,” he said. “And the world is a lot less pre­dictable now than we could ever have imagined. 

“You need look no fur­ther than Tahrir Square [in Cairo] to see the truth in that,” he con­tin­ued. “Fool­hardy would it be for us to make hasty judg­ments about the ben­e­fits –- tan­gi­ble and intan­gi­ble –- that are to be derived from forg­ing strong mil­i­tary rela­tion­ships over­seas, such as the one we enjoy with Egypt.” 

Mullen said the Pen­ta­gon must do its part as the gov­ern­ment strug­gles with finances. “I’ve long said we must not be exempt in the Defense Depart­ment from belt-tight­en­ing,” he told the House pan­el, “but in truth, there is lit­tle [that is] ‘dis­cre­tionary’ about the secu­ri­ty we pro­vide our fel­low cit­i­zens.” Cuts, he added, can go only so far with­out hol­low­ing the force. 

“In my view, then, this pro­posed bud­get builds on the bal­ance we start­ed to achieve last year and rep­re­sents the best of both fis­cal respon­si­bil­i­ty and sound nation­al secu­ri­ty,” the chair­man said. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →