USA — Panel Says Rescind Policy on Women in Combat

WASHINGTON, March 7, 2011 — A com­mis­sion estab­lished to study diver­si­ty among mil­i­tary lead­ers is rec­om­mend­ing that the Defense Depart­ment rescind its pol­i­cy that pre­vents women from being assigned to ground com­bat units below the brigade lev­el.
In a report issued today, the Mil­i­tary Lead­er­ship Diver­si­ty Com­mis­sion rec­om­mends that the depart­ment and the ser­vices elim­i­nate com­bat exclu­sion poli­cies for women, as well as oth­er “bar­ri­ers and incon­sis­ten­cies, to cre­ate a lev­el play­ing field for all qual­i­fied ser­vice mem­bers.”

Retired Air Force Gen. Lester L. Lyles, who chaired the com­mis­sion, said the rec­om­men­da­tion –- one of 20 in the report and the only one spe­cif­ic to women –- is one way the con­gres­sion­al­ly man­dat­ed body sug­gests the mil­i­tary can get more qual­i­fied women into its more-senior lead­er­ship ranks. 

“We know that [the exclu­sion] hin­ders women from pro­mo­tion,” Lyles said in an inter­view with Amer­i­can Forces Press Ser­vice. “We want to take away all the hin­drances and cul­tur­al bias­es” in promotions. 

The com­mis­sion was estab­lished as part of the 2009 Nation­al Defense Autho­riza­tion Act to eval­u­ate and assess poli­cies that pro­vide oppor­tu­ni­ties for pro­mo­tion and advance­ment of women and racial and eth­nic minori­ties in the armed forces. 

The 1994 com­bat exclu­sion pol­i­cy, as writ­ten, pre­cludes women from being “assigned” to ground com­bat units, but women have for years served in ground com­bat sit­u­a­tions by serv­ing in units deemed “attached” to ground units, Lyles said. That dis­tinc­tion keeps them from being rec­og­nized for their ground com­bat expe­ri­ence — recog­ni­tion that would enhance their chances for pro­mo­tion, he said. 

“If you look at today’s bat­tle­field — in Iraq and Afghanistan — it’s not like it was in the Cold War, when we had a defined bat­tle­field,” Lyles said. “Women serve -– and they lead –- mil­i­tary secu­ri­ty, mil­i­tary police units, air defense units, intel­li­gence units –- all of which have to be right there with com­bat vet­er­ans in order to do the job appropriately.” 

Women serv­ing in com­bat envi­ron­ments are being shot at, killed and maimed, Lyles said. 

“But they’re not get­ting the cred­it for being in com­bat arms,” he said, “[and] that’s impor­tant for their con­sid­er­a­tion for the most senior flag ranks — three stars and four stars, primarily.” 

In the commission’s out­reach to mil­i­tary lead­ers, Lyles said, at least a cou­ple of ser­vice lead­ers thought there would be lit­tle inter­est among women to serve in com­bat. But when the com­mis­sion brought in a pan­el of com­mis­sioned and enlist­ed women from dif­fer­ent ser­vices, “that’s cer­tain­ly not what we picked up” from talk­ing to them, he said. 

“I did­n’t hear, ‘Rah, rah, we want to be in com­bat,’ ” he said, “but I also did­n’t hear, ‘We don’t want to be in com­bat.’ What they want is an equal oppor­tu­ni­ty to serve where their skills allow them to serve. Remov­ing the bar­ri­ers for that, and remov­ing the bar­ri­ers to them get­ting cred­it for that, was our No. 1 focus.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →