USA — Army Needs to Bolster Troop, Family Support, Caseys Say

WASHINGTON — After nine years of war, it’s clear the nation will be engaged in con­flict for some time to come, but less evi­dent is what effect that long-term com­bat will have on ser­vice­mem­bers and their fam­i­lies, the Army chief of staff said today.

“We have to try to fig­ure out the cumu­la­tive effects — how they will man­i­fest them­selves after nine years of war,” Army Gen. George W. Casey Jr. said. “We have to work our way through that.” 

Speak­ing at the 2010 Defense Forum here, Casey and his wife, Sheila, expressed their con­cern for ser­vice­mem­bers and fam­i­lies who are strug­gling with the stress and demands of near­ly a decade of war. 

Amer­i­ca is in a peri­od of “per­sis­tent con­flict,” Casey noted. 

“Even though we’ve had some suc­cess in Iraq and have drawn down to about 50,000 Amer­i­can men and women there, the war isn’t over,” he said. “We’re at war with a glob­al extrem­ist ter­ror­ist net­work that attacked us on our soil. We believe this is a long-term ide­o­log­i­cal struggle.” 

Glob­al trends are exac­er­bat­ing the sit­u­a­tion rather than ame­lio­rat­ing it, Casey said. Glob­al­iza­tion, for instance, has cre­at­ed “have and have-not” cul­tures that increas­ing­ly are sus­cep­ti­ble to recruit­ment from ter­ror­ist orga­ni­za­tions. Also, pop­u­la­tions in some coun­tries will dou­ble in the next decade, result­ing in an increased demand for lim­it­ed resources. Casey said he’s most con­cerned with weapons of mass destruc­tion in the wrong hands and safe havens for ter­ror­ist orga­ni­za­tions. Ter­ror­ists have tried to attack Amer­i­cans on U.S. soil twice since Christ­mas, he noted. 

These fac­tors all add up to a sus­tained con­flict, “maybe not in the same scope, but a large num­ber of sol­diers deployed in harm’s way for a while,” Casey said. 

At the same time, the mil­i­tary still is deal­ing with the impact the past nine years of war have had on troops and their fam­i­lies, he said, cit­ing some sta­tis­tics to dri­ve the point home. More than 3,200 sol­diers have died, leav­ing more than 20,000 fam­i­ly mem­bers behind. More than 27,000 sol­diers have been wound­ed, with 7,500 of those sol­diers severe­ly wound­ed and requir­ing long-term care. Since 2000, the Army has diag­nosed about 100,000 sol­diers with trau­mat­ic brain injury, and since 2003, about 25,000 have been diag­nosed with post-trau­mat­ic stress. 

“I hon­est­ly think those num­bers are prob­a­bly low,” the gen­er­al said. “We wres­tle hard with reduc­ing the stig­ma of seek­ing care.” 

Casey called for bet­ter sup­port of sol­diers to build their resilience. It takes 24 to 36 months to recov­er from a com­bat deploy­ment, he said, cit­ing a recent study. Yet, the Army is deploy­ing sol­diers at a rate of one year deployed and one year at home. The Army’s objec­tive is to have two years at home between deploy­ments, but that won’t come to fruition till 2012. 

“We’re still a way from meet­ing that objec­tive,” he acknowl­edged. The best-case sce­nario, he added, would be to give sol­diers three years at home. 

A rapid deploy­ment pace and the cur­rent lack of “dwell time” at home have accel­er­at­ed the cumu­la­tive effects of war, Casey said, and his wife agreed. 

“Our sol­diers are stretched and they’re stressed,” Mrs. Casey said. “And par­ents, spous­es and chil­dren of our troops are all feel­ing the stress.” 

Mrs. Casey said she’s con­cerned for the fam­i­ly unit, espe­cial­ly young fam­i­lies who don’t have enough time to build the bonds that will sus­tain them, but yet are bat­tered with con­tin­u­al deployments. 

“I wor­ry about the long-term effect this is hav­ing on our chil­dren,” she said. 

Mrs. Casey recalled speak­ing with a woman a few years back. The woman expressed fears about her two young chil­dren nev­er know­ing or build­ing an emo­tion­al con­nec­tion with their father because of long sep­a­ra­tions due to deploy­ments. “The only thing I could do for her at that time was hold her as she cried,” she said. 

The general’s wife called for more ser­vices and sup­port to stay in front of the prob­lem. “If we wait until they’re back,” she said, “we’re not going to be able to react fast enough for them.” 

She also called for increased sup­port for fam­i­lies with the added chal­lenge of car­ing for wound­ed war­riors. The sup­port the nation owes these war­riors and their care­givers is “sig­nif­i­cant,” she said. 

To bol­ster this sup­port, the Army is putting con­sid­er­able efforts into devel­op­ing its behav­ioral health force, the gen­er­al said. 

Casey high­light­ed sev­er­al Army sup­port pro­grams, includ­ing the Com­pre­hen­sive Sol­dier Fit­ness pro­gram, which equips sol­diers with the tools to build resilience. The pro­gram fea­tures an online sur­vey that directs those with needs to online self-help mod­ules. More than 800,000 peo­ple have tak­en the program’s online sur­vey since Octo­ber, he noted. 

While progress has been made, much remains to be done, Casey acknowledged. 

The Caseys both praised mil­i­tary mem­bers and their fam­i­lies for their resilience in the face of the “new nor­mal” of mul­ti­ple com­bat tours. “Our troops and their fam­i­lies have man­aged remark­ably well,” the gen­er­al said. “You can be extreme­ly proud of the men and women, not only of the Army, but all of our armed forces.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →