Panetta: Services Must Work Jointly on Budget ‘Storms’

WASHINGTON, Oct. 12, 2011 — The ser­vices must work togeth­er to face mount­ing bud­get pres­sures and deter­mine the nation’s future mil­i­tary needs, Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta said today.

Speak­ing with hun­dreds of ser­vice mem­bers at the annu­al meet­ing of the Asso­ci­a­tion of the U.S. Army here, the sec­re­tary entered to a stand­ing ova­tion and in his remarks praised the men and women of the Army and dis­cussed a range of chal­lenges. Over 10 years of war, he said, “we’ve become the best coun­terin­sur­gency force in the world and we’ve also become the most adap­tive, the most expe­di­tionary and the most joint force in our country’s history.” 

Panet­ta said the ser­vices have to weath­er the present bud­get storms as a team, putting the needs of all before the needs of one. 

“We can’t do any­thing less,” he added. “The stakes are too high right now, and if we don’t tack­le these chal­lenges togeth­er, we will not be able to see our way clear to remain­ing the best mil­i­tary in the world.” 

Tough deci­sions lie ahead, the sec­re­tary said. 

“No one real­ly knows exact­ly what lies ahead in 10 or 20 or 30 years from now,” he added, “but one thing we know for sure: this coun­try, our fel­low cit­i­zens and, indeed, peo­ple around the world are going to con­tin­ue to look to Amer­i­ca for lead­er­ship and to Amer­i­can mil­i­tary pow­er for part­ner­ship and for lead­er­ship in the world.” 

The past 10 years have shaped the Army into the finest fight­ing force in the world, Panet­ta said. 

Since 9/11, more than 1 mil­lion sol­diers have deployed to com­bat in Iraq and Afghanistan, he said. More than 70,000 sol­diers serve in Afghanistan, near­ly 40,000 still serve in Iraq, and thou­sands more serve around the globe. 

“This bur­den has not come light­ly,” Panet­ta said. “More than 4,500 sol­diers have giv­en the last full mea­sure of devo­tion since 9/11, and anoth­er 32,000 sol­diers have been wounded.” 

From Iraq’s city streets to the moun­tains of Afghanistan, the sec­re­tary added, “America’s sol­diers �- active, Guard, Reserve — have been serv­ing and sac­ri­fic­ing, fight­ing and dying in order to pro­tect our free­doms, our lib­er­ties and our val­ues. That is the endur­ing sto­ry of the Amer­i­can soldier.” 

Today’s Army is unmatched by any in the world, the sec­re­tary said, and yet the mil­i­tary ser­vices, and the Army in par­tic­u­lar, have reached an impor­tant inflec­tion point. 

The Unit­ed States is bring­ing the war in Iraq to a respon­si­ble end, Panet­ta said, “and that coun­try now has a chance to emerge as a sov­er­eign, sta­ble, self-reliant nation and a pos­i­tive force for sta­bil­i­ty in a vital region of the world.” 

Afghanistan still is a tough fight, he added, but con­di­tions are being set for a respon­si­ble tran­si­tion to Afghan secu­ri­ty by the end of 2014. 

“As we draw down in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Army will gain final­ly some much-need­ed strate­gic breath­ing space ‑� already, com­bat deploy­ments are being short­ened from 12 months to nine months,” the sec­re­tary said. 

“We must use this time well and wise­ly,” he added, “because as wel­come as it is, it comes as we face an extra­or­di­nary fis­cal pres­sure on the mil­i­tary, on the Defense [Depart­ment] and, for that mat­ter, on the coun­try. This depart­ment faces the imper­a­tive of cut­ting more than $450 bil­lion over the next 10 years.” 

The depart­ment is will­ing to do its part, he said, but “there are some who con­tin­ue pro­pose even deep­er cuts in defense, argu­ing that the dra­con­ian cuts that are part of this crazy dooms­day mech­a­nism called sequester — a $1 tril­lion cut if it takes effect — some­how won’t impact on our nation­al security.” 

Seques­tra­tion would force across-the-board, “sala­mi-slic­ing” cuts of the worst kind, he said. 

“It would hol­low out the force,” he added. “It would leave our mil­i­tary defi­cient in peo­ple, in train­ing and [in] equip­ment, and unable to adapt when the next secu­ri­ty chal­lenge comes along.” 

The same mis­take was made after World War I, after World War II, after Korea, after Viet­nam and after the col­lapse of the Sovi­et Union, he said. 

“We must nev­er make that mis­take again,” Panet­ta added. “And it will not hap­pen under my watch.” 

The inter­na­tion­al secu­ri­ty envi­ron­ment is grow­ing in com­plex­i­ty and uncer­tain­ty, he said, and the nation and the world must con­tin­ue to deal with ter­ror­ism and the threat of vio­lent extremism. 

“My job is to make sure we’re ready for that role,” the sec­re­tary said, “across a com­plex group of mis­sions, to ensure that our armed forces remain the very best in the world and that our Army remains the finest strate­gic land force in the world.” 

The nation’s future mil­i­tary will be small­er, but must be able to address such future chal­lenges, which like­ly will come from “state and non­state actors arm­ing with high-tech weapon­ry that is eas­i­er both to buy and to oper­ate — weapons that frus­trate our tra­di­tion­al advan­tage and free­dom of move­ment,” Panet­ta said. 

“Com­ing up with new ideas, with new oper­at­ing prin­ci­ples to defeat these kind of ene­mies,” the sec­re­tary said, “is a chal­lenge that I pose to this bat­tle-hard­ened gen­er­a­tion of Amer­i­can soldiers.” 

Today’s men and women in uni­form are as cre­ative and men­tal­ly agile on the bat­tle­field as are their con­tem­po­raries in high-tech idea labs in Sil­i­con Val­ley, Panet­ta said. 

“The excel­lence of our great­est asset, our sol­diers,” the sec­re­tary added, “gives me con­fi­dence that we can craft an Army orga­nized, trained and equipped to pre­vail in the future.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →