Defense Official: Pakistan Deserves U.S. Respect, Support

ISLAMABAD, Pak­istan, Dec. 15, 2010 — Pak­istan deserves America’s respect and sup­port for its fight against extrem­ists in the coun­try, a defense offi­cial said here today.
The offi­cial, speak­ing to reporters on back­ground, said the Unit­ed States wants Pak­istan to do more to elim­i­nate ter­ror­ist sanc­tu­ar­ies in North Waziris­tan, where the Haqqani net­work and oth­er extrem­ist groups are using the trib­al-area province to plan and launch attacks against NATO troops in Afghanistan.

Pak­istani mil­i­tary lead­ers con­sis­tent­ly say they will address North Waziris­tan, but not yet, the offi­cial said. In the mean­time, Pakistan’s mil­i­tary has been active else­where. The Pak­istani mil­i­tary has moved 140,000 troops to the bor­der area with Afghanistan, the offi­cial said, suf­fer­ing loss­es of between 1,500 and 2,000 killed in action and per­haps four times that many wound­ed in the past 19 months. 

“Two years ago, this kind of effort, these kinds of sac­ri­fices would be unthink­able,” the offi­cial said. “There has been 19 months of sus­tained combat.” 

The Pak­istani army has been active against ter­ror groups in the Swat Val­ley, the Khy­ber trib­al area, South Waziris­tan and Bai­jur. The equiv­a­lent of sev­en divi­sions – each around 20,000 strong – is engaged in the region, the offi­cial said. 

Unprece­dent­ed mon­soon flood­ing in the sum­mer ham­pered mil­i­tary oper­a­tions. Because the Pak­istani mil­i­tary is the country’s most effec­tive aid and res­cue orga­ni­za­tion, troops remained along the west­ern bor­der while their enablers – medics, engi­neers, logis­ti­cians, heli­copters, trans­port and so on – shift­ed to flood relief oper­a­tions. The Pak­istani mil­i­tary is stretched thin, the offi­cial said. 

“They are fac­ing the same chal­lenge that U.S. and coali­tion forces faced in Iraq, and now Afghanistan,” the offi­cial said. “It’s one thing to clear the geog­ra­phy of mil­i­tant pres­ence. It’s quite anoth­er thing to ren­der the pop­u­la­tion and the area resis­tant enough to mil­i­tant return that you can actu­al­ly with­draw the army.” Local and nation­al civil­ian insti­tu­tions can­not han­dle that mis­sion, leav­ing the mil­i­tary to guard against extrem­ists reclaim­ing the area, the offi­cial explained. “Our assess­ment is [that the Pak­istani mil­i­tary is] unable to con­duct sig­nif­i­cant new offen­sive oper­a­tions until they can find a way to get sig­nif­i­cant new troops or real­lo­cate troops they have,” the offi­cial said. 

Pak­istan will deal with North Waziris­tan when it has the resources avail­able and on its own timetable, the offi­cial said. 

“We’ve got to be dis­ci­plined in not con­fus­ing what we want the Pak­ista­nis to do with what the Pak­ista­nis want to do,” the offi­cial said. “It does­n’t mean one side is right or wrong; it’s that they are different.” 

The U.S. focus is on tak­ing out the Afghan Tal­iban who are using North Waziris­tan as their base. The Pak­istani atti­tude on the ter­ror groups in North Waziris­tan may be chang­ing. The Haqqani net­work is killing NATO troops and Afghans, but report­ed­ly is not killing Pak­ista­nis. But Pak­istani offi­cers are com­ing to the con­clu­sion that the stew of ter­ror groups in the province is more like a syn­di­cate than sep­a­rate and dis­tinct groups, the offi­cial said. 

“This is a syn­di­cate of relat­ed and asso­ci­at­ed mil­i­tant groups and net­works,” he said. “Try­ing to parse them as if they had fire­walls between them is real­ly kind of sil­ly. They coop­er­ate with each oth­er and fran­chise work with each other.” 

But hav­ing the will to take on the ter­ror groups in the province is one thing, and hav­ing the capa­bil­i­ty to take them on is anoth­er, the offi­cial acknowl­edged. “The worst thing that could hap­pen is for the Pak­istani mil­i­tary to pick a fight with the Haqqani net­work and lose,” he said. 

Progress is com­ing about in Pak­istan through small changes that even­tu­al­ly lead to a change in mind­set, the offi­cial said. Trust is a big part of this, he added, and U.S. mil­i­tary and civil­ian offi­cials must con­tin­ue con­fi­dence-build­ing measures. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →