Afghanistan Strategy Works, Needs Time, General Says

WASHINGTON, Oct. 26, 2010 — Coali­tion forces’ coun­terin­sur­gency strat­e­gy in Afghanistan is work­ing but the approach needs time to build on the past year’s gains, a mil­i­tary offi­cial said here yes­ter­day.

“Our progress is slow and steady, but we are mak­ing progress. And addi­tion­al oppor­tu­ni­ties are being cre­at­ed by the progress that we’re mak­ing,” Army Brig. Gen. John W. Nichol­son Jr. said. 

Nichol­son, direc­tor of the Joint Staff’s Afghanistan-Pak­istan coor­di­na­tion cell, pre­sent­ed an Afghanistan oper­a­tional update dur­ing the Asso­ci­a­tion of the Unit­ed States Army annu­al conference. 

Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, com­man­der of U.S. and Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force troops in Afghanistan, pre­pared the brief­ing and would have pre­sent­ed it him­self had duties not kept him in Kab­ul, Nichol­son said. 

“Today he’s sit­ting down with all the com­man­ders of ISAF [and] with the Afghan gov­ern­ment lead­er­ship, going over how we inte­grate our civ­il-mil­i­tary efforts in Afghanistan,” Nichol­son said. 

The coun­terin­sur­gency approach of “clear, hold, build” is suc­ceed­ing, Nichol­son said, thanks large­ly to the 50,000 troops added to coali­tion forces since 2009. 

“We’ve intro­duced [coali­tion forces] into Kan­da­har and Hel­mand, the most vio­lent places in Afghanistan –- places that have nev­er been cleared,” he said. 

Over the past nine years, the alliance nev­er had enough forces to clear those areas, Nichol­son said. Now, ISAF is killing, cap­tur­ing or dri­ving off ene­my forces there to pro­vide secu­ri­ty for the Afghan people. 

Nichol­son said the coun­terin­sur­gency strategy’s “clear” phase involves main­tain­ing pres­sure on the ene­my by deny­ing safe havens, dis­rupt­ing fund­ing, sup­plies and com­mu­ni­ca­tions, and killing or cap­tur­ing ene­my troops and more impor­tant­ly, leaders. 

In Afghanistan, he said, the task of cap­tur­ing or killing ene­my lead­ers is most often con­duct­ed by spe­cial oper­a­tions forces.

“Every 24 hours on aver­age, we are killing or cap­tur­ing three to five mid-lev­el lead­ers and 25 ene­my fight­ers,” Nichol­son said. Such attri­tion to the enemy’s lead­er­ship ranks, he said, is “severe­ly dis­rupt­ing their com­mand and con­trol in the country.” 

Insur­gent morale in Afghanistan is suf­fer­ing as a result, Nichol­son said. 

The coalition’s cur­rent efforts in Afghanistan, he said, focus on Kan­da­har and Hel­mand provinces in south­ern Afghanistan and Kunar in the east. These three provinces are the site of 65 per­cent of the country’s insur­gent activ­i­ty, he said, and are the focus of ISAF efforts to move in, remove ene­my forces, pro­tect the pop­u­la­tion, and extend the reach of government. 

“The secu­ri­ty cam­paign is the first dimen­sion of a com­pre­hen­sive [coun­terin­sur­gency] cam­paign,” Nichol­son said. “Gov­er­nance will always lag behind secu­ri­ty, because until the peo­ple have con­fi­dence that … they are going to be safe, it’s very tough to achieve a con­nec­tion between the peo­ple and the government.” 

To rein­force secu­ri­ty gains, the U.S. Army’s 10th Moun­tain Divi­sion will “plant its flag” in Kan­da­har this month, he said, cre­at­ing the first two-star head­quar­ters in south­ern Afghanistan. 

As Kandahar’s secu­ri­ty sta­bi­lizes, coali­tion troops and civil­ians will work with the Afghan gov­ern­ment to fur­ther eco­nom­ic devel­op­ment and tran­si­tion agri­cul­ture in the region from opi­um to legal and prof­itable crops, Nichol­son said. 

“[This will] enable the peo­ple to have a stake in the future and see a path to a bet­ter life for them­selves and their fam­i­lies,” he said. 

As the Afghan gov­ern­ment estab­lish­es a pres­ence in the cleared areas, the people’s con­fi­dence will fol­low, Nichol­son said, not­ing that is already hap­pen­ing in many of the country’s provinces, where local gov­er­nance, school atten­dance and com­merce have increased since 2001. 

Nichol­son cit­ed the 2009 U.S. Marine cam­paign in Nawa, Afghanistan, as proof of the coun­terin­sur­gency concept. 

“What we’re see­ing now is the places we’ve been [in] longer, like Nawa, where we’ve been for almost 18 months, we’re see­ing pos­i­tive effects,” he said. 

Those effects will fol­low in Kan­da­har, Nichol­son said, where six brigades of U.S., Cana­di­an and Afghan forces are clear­ing the area “hedgerow-by-hedgerow and house-by-house.” 

Over this year, the Afghan force pres­ence in the area has increased to 60 per­cent, from rough­ly 20 per­cent in 2009, he said. 

“This is one of the strongest signs of progress,” Nichol­son said. “We clear­ly want to get them to a point in terms of capa­bil­i­ty and pro­fes­sion­al­ism where they take over the fight from us, and we can shift to an advise-and-assist role and even­tu­al­ly trans­fer secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ties to them.” 

Nichol­son said Afghanistan Pres­i­dent Hamid Karzai has stat­ed he wants all secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ty trans­ferred to Afghan forces by 2014. 

Because only 14 per­cent of Afghan mil­i­tary recruits can read and write, lit­er­a­cy pro­grams are as impor­tant as mil­i­tary train­ing and pro­fes­sion­al­iz­ing the force, he said. 

“In Iraq, you had lit­er­a­cy and … an estab­lished civ­il ser­vice class,” Nichol­son said. “We don’t have that in Afghanistan, but we’re under­tak­ing sig­nif­i­cant lit­er­a­cy train­ing programs.” 

The coali­tion also has worked with the country’s author­i­ties to estab­lish Afghan local police rep­re­sen­ta­tion in vil­lages, he said, there­by extend­ing the government’s reach to more people. 

Afghan local police mem­bers report to the Min­istry of the Inte­ri­or and serve in a defen­sive role, as well as pro­vid­ing some basic gov­ern­ment ser­vices to the pop­u­la­tion, he said. 

Fos­ter­ing the people’s trust in gov­ern­ment is dif­fi­cult, Nichol­son said, because Afghanistan has expe­ri­enced sev­er­al forms of gov­ern­ment in 30 years, includ­ing monar­chy, com­mu­nism, anar­chy or war­lordism, the Tal­iban and theoc­ra­cy, and now, democracy. 

“We have to over­come [the Afghan people’s] skep­ti­cism of cen­tral gov­ern­ment, and frankly a lack of knowl­edge about what this gov­ern­ment is and what it offers,” he said. 

Estab­lish­ing effec­tive gov­ern­ment rela­tions with the pop­u­la­tion will first require devel­op­ing civ­il ser­vice capac­i­ty and increas­ing edu­ca­tion, the gen­er­al said. 

In his view, Nichol­son said, edu­ca­tion may be the sin­gle-most impor­tant fac­tor in Afghanistan’s long-term success. 

“The major­i­ty of the pop­u­la­tion is under 18,” he said. “This next gen­er­a­tion is cru­cial to the future of Afghanistan.” 

Build­ing the infra­struc­ture to sup­port an agri­cul­tur­al econ­o­my also is crit­i­cal to Afghanistan’s suc­cess, the gen­er­al said. Paving roads so crops can be trans­port­ed, estab­lish­ing trade routes and pro­mot­ing eco­nom­ic exchange, and pro­vid­ing elec­tri­cal pow­er to run pack­ag­ing plants are all essen­tial to that infra­struc­ture, he said. 

And, in a nation where the aver­age life expectan­cy is 45, and 20 per­cent of chil­dren die before age 5, health care is a press­ing need, Nichol­son said. 

“Sim­ple things like rudi­men­ta­ry health care can make an enor­mous dif­fer­ence in their lives,” he said. 

The Red Cross has estab­lished clin­ics in sev­er­al vil­lages around Kan­da­har, Nichol­son said, and that suc­cess empha­sizes the need for non­mil­i­tary agen­cies’ help in estab­lish­ing a secure future for Afghanistan. 

In Novem­ber, he not­ed, heads of state from 50 nations con­tribut­ing troops or aid to Afghanistan will meet in Lis­bon, Por­tu­gal, for a NATO conference. 

“At this con­fer­ence we expect the con­ver­sa­tion to be about tran­si­tion to Afghan con­trol,” Nichol­son said. “So there’s a process work­ing now between NATO and the Afghan gov­ern­ment to define … the con­di­tions that need to be met to tran­si­tion con­trol of dis­tricts and provinces to Afghans.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →